Evidence-grade · Registered-dietitian reviewed · No sponsored placements Methodology · Editorial standards

Evidence briefs

Plain-language summaries of the primary research underlying our app evaluation methodology and clinical claims. Every brief is sourced from a named, citable paper and reviewed by our medical reviewer.

Evidence brief

Firoz & Graber 2001: Bioavailability of US Commercial Magnesium Preparations

A small randomized crossover comparing four commercial magnesium salts — oxide, chloride, lactate, and aspartate — measuring 24-hour urinary magnesium excretion as a proxy for bioavailability. Magnesium oxide showed substantially lower absorption than the chloride, lactate, and aspartate forms.

Magnesium Research · 2001 · DOI: [pending verification] · Summarized Apr 11, 2026

Evidence brief

Grgic et al. 2018: Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Hypertrophy

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 22 studies examining whether training frequency — independent of total weekly volume — alters strength gains. When weekly set volume was equated, frequency showed no significant independent effect on strength outcomes.

Sports Medicine · 2018 · DOI: 10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x · Summarized Apr 11, 2026

Evidence brief

Helms et al. 2023: Protein Distribution Across Daily Meals

Narrative review synthesizing acute muscle protein synthesis (MPS) data and longer-term body-composition outcomes to address whether per-meal protein distribution — independent of total daily intake — affects lean mass accretion. Even distribution across 3–5 meals containing 0.4–0.55 g/kg/meal appears practically optimal, though the size of the distribution effect is modest when total intake is adequate.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2023 · DOI: [pending verification] · Summarized Apr 11, 2026

Evidence brief

Morton et al. 2018: Protein Supplementation and Resistance Training

Meta-analysis of 49 randomized trials (n = 1,863) examining whether protein supplementation augments resistance-training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength. Protein supplementation produced significant additive gains, with a meta-regression identifying ~1.62 g/kg/day as the breakpoint above which further intake produces no detectable additional benefit.

British Journal of Sports Medicine · 2018 · DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097608 · Summarized Apr 11, 2026

Evidence brief

Res et al. 2012: Pre-Sleep Protein Ingestion and Overnight MPS

Crossover trial in 16 young men comparing 40 g pre-sleep casein versus placebo following an evening resistance exercise session. Pre-sleep protein was digested and absorbed during sleep, raised whole-body protein synthesis rates, and increased mixed-muscle protein synthesis overnight.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise · 2012 · DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31824cc363 · Summarized Apr 11, 2026

Evidence brief

Schoenfeld et al. 2017: Dose-Response of Weekly Resistance Training Volume

Meta-analysis of 15 studies establishing a graded dose-response between weekly resistance training set volume and muscle hypertrophy. Higher weekly set counts produced larger hypertrophy effects, with a notable jump observed above approximately 10 sets per muscle group per week.

Journal of Sports Sciences · 2017 · DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197 · Summarized Apr 11, 2026